We analyzed blush coverage extent and intensity in the cultivar Honeycrisp to 1) define categories of marketable blush in terms relating to device-independent color measurements; 2) assess relationships among a modified anthocyanin index (AI(m)) calculated from spectral measurements, colorimetry (CO), and human judgment of apple blush intensity; 3) assess the efficacy of digital image analysis (DIA) of color-calibrated digital photography learn more as a tool to measure blush coverage extent; and 4) explore differences between human judgment of blush coverage

extent and DIA. AI(m) and CO were both effective in providing statistical categorical separation among five classes of apple blush in ‘Honeycrisp’:

“non-blush,” “slight non-marketable blush,” “minimum quality marketable blush,” “clear marketable blush,” and “outstanding blush” as judged by human participants. The boundary between blush and non-blush was judged to be a hue angle less than 49.0 +/- 3.1 h(ab) in CIELAB L*C(ab)*h(ab) color space and an AI(m) value greater than 4.3 +/- 1.3 at alpha <0.05. DIA was less sensitive and did not show statistically significant differences between “clear marketable blush” and “outstanding marketable blush,” although its use to distinguish the other categories was successful. All methods of analysis resulted in high agreement with respect to the blush/non-blush boundary (Cohen’s kappa >= 0.897).”
“Reasons for performing study: Repair of incisional hernias in horses has been described previously; however, this report describes Pitavastatin cost Staurosporine price the outcome of primary closure of incisional hernias in a large number of horses and compares these results with those of mesh implantation.\n\nObjective:

To report the perioperative care, complications and long-term outcome of primary closure of incisional hernias in horses and to compare these results with a second population of horses in which prosthetic mesh was used.\n\nMethods: Medical records of horses undergoing an incisional herniorrhaphy between 1998 and 2009 were reviewed. Information obtained included case details, factors from the initial surgery that contributed to the hernia formation, method of hernia repair and outcome. Comparisons between horses with and without mesh were made using logistic regression.\n\nResults: Thirty-eight horses with primary closure and 9 horses with mesh implantation met inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up for cases in which a mesh was not used was available for 25 cases; of these, 21 horses (84%) had a normal cosmetic appearance and 4 (16%) had a visible defect. There was no significant difference between the 2 repair methods in terms of age, sex, breed, weight, size of the hernia, number of defects, timing of the repair or cosmetic outcome.